California has no state estate tax and no state inheritance tax. For a person who dies in 2026, the federal government exempts the first $15,000,000 of an individual estate from tax, and a married couple can shelter $30,000,000 combined through portability. For the overwhelming majority of California families, the estate tax question has a one-word answer: no. What actually costs Californians money at death is usually property tax reassessment under Proposition 19, and, less often, a missed opportunity on capital gains basis. Neither of those is an “estate tax,” but both behave like one if nobody is watching for them.
That does not mean death has no tax consequences here. It means the tax that actually bites almost never matches the one people ask about.
What are the 2026 federal estate and gift tax figures?
| Figure | Amount | As of / source |
|---|---|---|
| Federal estate and gift tax exemption, per person | $15,000,000 | Deaths in 2026, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Pub. L. 119-21 (July 4, 2025), IRC § 2010(c)(3) |
| Combined married-couple exemption with portability | $30,000,000 | 2026, IRC § 2010(c)(4); requires a timely filed Form 706 for the first spouse to die |
| Annual gift tax exclusion, per recipient | $19,000 | 2026, Rev. Proc. 2025-32 § 3.42(1) |
| Scheduled sunset | None | Permanent under Public Law 119-21; the exemption indexes for inflation after 2026 |
Two things in that table matter more than the headline number. First, the exemption is permanent. The prior tax law’s much lower exemption range was scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025; Public Law 119-21 replaced that cliff with a permanent $15,000,000 base that adjusts for inflation going forward, with no expiration date currently on the books. Second, the $19,000 annual gift exclusion is separate from the estate exemption; it lets any person give that amount to any recipient each year with no gift tax return required, and using it consistently can shrink a taxable estate well before death matters. Third, the $30,000,000 married-couple figure is not automatic. It depends on portability, meaning the executor of the first spouse to die must file a federal estate tax return (Form 706) on time to elect and preserve the deceased spouse’s unused exemption amount (DSUE) under IRC § 2010(c)(4), even when the estate is nowhere near large enough to owe tax. Skip that filing and the surviving spouse’s advisor has one exemption to work with instead of two.
Did California ever have an estate tax or an inheritance tax?
California had a state inheritance tax before 1982. It has not existed since, and no state estate tax has ever replaced it. When people search for a “California estate tax,” what they are usually finding is old information about that repealed tax, out-of-date coverage of the federal exemption, or confusion between an estate tax and the two things that actually do cost money here: property tax reassessment and, occasionally, an avoidable capital gains hit.
If there’s no estate tax, why do people still lose money at death in California?
Two mechanisms do the damage that an estate tax would otherwise do, and neither one shows up on an IRS form.
Proposition 19 property tax reassessment
California reassesses real property to full market value on a change of ownership, with a narrow parent-child exclusion under Revenue and Taxation Code § 63.2 (the current statute; § 63.1, the old Proposition 58 version, was repealed). To qualify, the property must have been the parent’s principal residence, the child must move in and make it their own principal residence within one year of the transfer, and the child must file for the homeowners’ or disabled veterans’ exemption. Even when the exclusion applies, it is not unlimited: it only shelters the property’s factored base value plus an indexed amount, currently $1,044,586 for transfers between February 16, 2025 and February 15, 2027 (set by the California State Board of Equalization and adjusted every other year). Anything above that combined figure gets added to the assessed value going forward. A rental or a second home the child will not occupy gets no exclusion at all and is reassessed to full market value.
That reassessment, not a federal estate tax bill, is the tax event that actually surprises California families. See Prop 19 planning for how to structure a transfer around it, and the estate tax calculator to model your own numbers.
Capital gains basis: the step-up that actually saves money
The other lever is basis, not tax rate. Under IRC § 1014(b)(6), community property gets a full double step-up in basis at the first spouse’s death: both halves of the asset are revalued to date-of-death fair market value, not just the half that was includible in the deceased spouse’s estate. Property held in joint tenancy, by contrast, only steps up on the decedent’s one-half share; the survivor’s original basis carries forward on the other half. For a married couple whose biggest asset is an appreciated house or a stock portfolio, the difference between community property and joint tenancy titling can mean tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of avoidable capital gains tax when the survivor eventually sells. This is a titling and planning question, not an estate tax question, and it is one a living trust is built to get right. See the living trust attorney page.
Consider a couple who bought appreciated stock or a rental property decades ago and held it until the first spouse’s death. Held as community property, the entire asset steps up to its date-of-death value: if the surviving spouse sells shortly after, there is little or no capital gains tax on the appreciation that built up during the marriage. Held in joint tenancy instead, only the decedent’s one-half share steps up; the survivor’s original basis on their own half carries forward, and a sale shortly after still triggers gain on the unstepped-up half. Same asset, same date of death, same family, and a materially different tax bill, driven entirely by how the asset was titled while both spouses were alive.
Who still needs federal estate tax planning in 2026?
Individuals with estates approaching or exceeding $15,000,000, and married couples approaching or exceeding $30,000,000 combined, still need federal estate tax planning: exemption use, lifetime gifting strategy, and irrevocable trust structures aimed at keeping future appreciation out of the taxable estate. For everyone below that range, and that is nearly every California family, the federal exemption is not the planning problem. The planning problem is Prop 19, basis, and the ordinary cost and delay of probate if the estate is not in a trust. See the estate tax planning attorney page and 2026 California estate law changes for what actually changed this year.
Portability deserves its own paragraph because it is the single most common federal planning mistake made by estates well under the exemption. If the first spouse to die has separate assets or a share of community property and the surviving spouse might later remarry, receive an inheritance, or simply see their own assets appreciate past $15,000,000, the estate of the first spouse must still file a federal Form 706 within the filing deadline to elect portability and lock in the deceased spouse’s unused exemption amount. No tax is owed on that return in the vast majority of cases. The filing is the only way to preserve the second exemption for later use. Skipping it because “we’re nowhere near the threshold” is exactly how a surviving spouse’s estate ends up with one $15,000,000 exemption instead of a combined $30,000,000, years after the mistake can be fixed.
Do I still need an estate plan if I’m under $15,000,000?
Yes, and this is where the estate tax conversation misleads people the most. Being under the federal exemption means no estate tax is owed. It says nothing about whether your family avoids probate, whether your house gets reassessed when it passes to your kids, whether your spouse gets the full community property basis step-up, or who makes medical and financial decisions for you if you lose capacity before you die. A living trust, a durable power of attorney, and an advance health care directive solve all of those problems, and none of them turn on the size of the federal exemption. The estate tax exemption answers one narrow question. Nearly everything else in an estate plan is unrelated to it.
Worked example: a $2,000,000 California estate
Take a $2,000,000 estate: a house and some savings, well inside the range of a comfortable California family and nowhere near the $15,000,000 federal threshold. There is no federal estate tax due, full stop. But two costs are very real.
Property tax. Suppose the house has a parent’s factored base value of $400,000 and a market value of $1,800,000, and it passes to a child who moves in within the year and files the homeowners’ exemption. The § 63.2 exclusion covers the factored base plus the indexed amount: $400,000 + $1,044,586 = $1,444,586. The excess, $1,800,000 minus $1,444,586, is $355,414. That amount gets added to the factored base, producing a new assessed value of $400,000 + $355,414 = $755,414, nearly double the parent’s old assessment, and the property tax bill rises accordingly, permanently.
Probate. If that same $2,000,000 estate is not in a funded living trust, it goes through probate, and the statutory attorney and personal representative fees under Prob. Code §§ 10810 and 10800 are calculated on the same tiered schedule for each: $33,000 for the attorney and another $33,000 for the personal representative, $66,000 combined, computed on the gross value of the assets before any mortgage or debt is subtracted. A funded living trust avoids that fee entirely.
Neither of those numbers is a tax. Both of them are bigger, in most California estates, than the federal estate tax bill, which is zero.
What’s the rule of thumb here?
In California, the estate tax question is usually the wrong question. The right questions are whether real property is titled to get the community property double step-up, whether a home transfer is structured to survive Prop 19 reassessment, and whether the estate is in a trust so it skips probate altogether.
Frequently asked questions
Does California have an estate tax in 2026?
No. California has no state estate tax. Only the federal estate tax applies, and in 2026 it exempts the first $15,000,000 per person ($30,000,000 per married couple with portability).
Does California have an inheritance tax?
No. California had a state inheritance tax before 1982; it does not exist today, and no replacement has been enacted.
What is the federal estate tax exemption for 2026?
$15,000,000 per person, $30,000,000 combined for a married couple through portability, under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Pub. L. 119-21) and IRC § 2010(c)(3)-(c)(4). The exemption is permanent, with no scheduled sunset, and indexes for inflation after 2026.
What happens to a $2,000,000 estate in California at death?
No federal estate tax is owed. The real costs are Proposition 19 reassessment on real property that does not qualify for the parent-child exclusion, and, if the estate is not in a funded living trust, statutory probate fees under Prob. Code §§ 10810 and 10800.
What is the real estate tax question in California?
In California, the estate tax question is usually the wrong question. The questions that actually cost families money are Prop 19 reassessment, capital gains basis, and whether the estate avoids probate.
Do I need to file anything with the IRS if my estate is under $15,000,000?
Usually no return is required. See the IRS estate and gift tax page for the current filing thresholds. The one exception worth knowing about is portability: if a married person dies and the surviving spouse might want the deceased spouse’s unused exemption available later, the estate should still file Form 706 by the deadline to elect portability under IRC § 2010(c)(4), even though no tax is owed. Missing that filing is the most common way a family loses access to the combined $30,000,000 exemption.
Will the $15,000,000 exemption go back down later?
Not on any currently scheduled date. The prior law’s 2025 sunset, which would have cut the exemption roughly in half, was repealed and replaced by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s permanent $15,000,000 base (Pub. L. 119-21, IRC § 2010(c)(3)), which indexes upward for inflation after 2026. There is no scheduled reduction as of this writing.
If you want to know what your own estate actually faces, that conversation is worth having before a death forces it. A living trust addresses the probate and basis side; a Prop 19 review addresses the property tax side.
Want a straight read on where you stand?
Talk to Eric. A free 30-minute call, no pitch. He’ll tell you where you’re exposed, what it would cost to fix, and what you can skip.
Talk to Eric